[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJWu+opFKUS4WSqZu0iG_0W5ou8sry-9YYx6L1sSuvzvH2s-ag@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 19:23:46 -0700
From: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Brendan Jackman <brendan.jackman@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Use policy-dependent
transition delays
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 11, 2017 12:20:41 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>>
>> Make the schedutil governor take the initial (default) value of the
>> rate_limit_us sysfs attribute from the (new) transition_delay_us
>> policy parameter (to be set by the scaling driver).
>>
>> That will allow scaling drivers to make schedutil use smaller default
>> values of rate_limit_us and reduce the default average time interval
>> between consecutive frequency changes.
>>
>> Make intel_pstate set transition_delay_us to 500.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>> ---
>>
>> This is a replacement for https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9671831/
>
> Any concerns about this one?
Looks good to me.
Thanks,
Joel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists