[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-38fcd06e9b7f6855db1f3ebac5e18b8fdb467ffd@git.kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2017 07:07:04 -0700
From: "tip-bot for Darren Hart (VMware)" <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: hpa@...or.com, dvhart@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org
Subject: [tip:locking/core] futex: Clarify mark_wake_futex memory barrier
usage
Commit-ID: 38fcd06e9b7f6855db1f3ebac5e18b8fdb467ffd
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/38fcd06e9b7f6855db1f3ebac5e18b8fdb467ffd
Author: Darren Hart (VMware) <dvhart@...radead.org>
AuthorDate: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 15:31:38 -0700
Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CommitDate: Sat, 15 Apr 2017 16:03:46 +0200
futex: Clarify mark_wake_futex memory barrier usage
Clarify the scenario described in mark_wake_futex requiring the
smp_store_release(). Update the comment to explicitly refer to the
plist_del now under __unqueue_futex() (previously plist_del was in the
same function as the comment).
Signed-off-by: Darren Hart (VMware) <dvhart@...radead.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170414223138.GA4222@fury
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
---
kernel/futex.c | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
index ede2f1e..357348a 100644
--- a/kernel/futex.c
+++ b/kernel/futex.c
@@ -1380,10 +1380,11 @@ static void mark_wake_futex(struct wake_q_head *wake_q, struct futex_q *q)
wake_q_add(wake_q, p);
__unqueue_futex(q);
/*
- * The waiting task can free the futex_q as soon as
- * q->lock_ptr = NULL is written, without taking any locks. A
- * memory barrier is required here to prevent the following
- * store to lock_ptr from getting ahead of the plist_del.
+ * The waiting task can free the futex_q as soon as q->lock_ptr = NULL
+ * is written, without taking any locks. This is possible in the event
+ * of a spurious wakeup, for example. A memory barrier is required here
+ * to prevent the following store to lock_ptr from getting ahead of the
+ * plist_del in __unqueue_futex().
*/
smp_store_release(&q->lock_ptr, NULL);
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists