[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170416204621.GA24360@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2017 21:46:21 +0100
From: Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kyle McMartin <kyle@...hat.com>, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
x86@...nel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
keyrings@...r.kernel.org, matthew.garrett@...ula.com,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/24] Add a sysrq option to exit secure boot mode
On Fri, 14 Apr, at 08:05:07PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Apr 2017, David Howells wrote:
>
> > From: Kyle McMartin <kyle@...hat.com>
> >
> > Make sysrq+x exit secure boot mode on x86_64, thereby allowing the running
> > kernel image to be modified. This lifts the lockdown.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@...hat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
> > cc: x86@...nel.org
>
> Matt, Ard?
>
> Any opinions on this?
Looks OK to me.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists