[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1492381958.25766.50.camel@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 08:32:38 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>,
Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>,
Max Gurtovoy <maxg@...lanox.com>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...1.01.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/8] Copy Offload with Peer-to-Peer PCI Memory
On Sun, 2017-04-16 at 10:47 -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> > I think you need to give other archs a chance to support this with a
> > design that considers the offset case as a first class citizen rather
> > than an afterthought.
>
> I'll consider this. Given the fact I can use your existing
> get_dev_pagemap infrastructure to look up the p2pmem device this
> probably isn't as hard as I thought it would be anyway (we probably
> don't even need a page flag). We'd just have lookup the dev_pagemap,
> test if it's a p2pmem device, and if so, call a p2pmem_dma_map function
> which could apply the offset or do any other arch specific logic (if
> necessary).
I'm still not 100% why do you need a "p2mem device" mind you ...
Cheers,
Ben.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists