[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170416224537.GB694@zurbaran.ger.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 00:45:49 +0200
From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfc: fix get_unaligned_...() misuses
On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 05:58:59PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 05:48:47PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > * use unaligned.h, not unaligned/access_ok.h
>
> ... which got misspelled in that patch, sorry... Fixed variant follows:
>
> commit b3e79ba1708c9b74781079c9f8617448fce36b51
> Author: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
> Date: Thu Apr 6 12:42:14 2017 -0400
>
> nfc: fix get_unaligned_...() misuses
>
> * use unaligned.h, not unaligned/access_ok.h
> * if a local variable of type uint16_t is unaligned, your compiler is FUBAR
> * the whole point of get_unaligned_... is to avoid memcpy + ..._to_cpu().
> Using it *after* memcpy() (into aligned object, no less) is pointless.
>
> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Partly applied to nfc-next. The unaligned/access_ok.h replacements were
already applied.
Cheers,
Samuel.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists