[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170417105304.GG518@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 19:53:04 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@....com,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] zram: fix operator precedence to get offset
On (04/17/17 19:50), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
[..]
> so in the existing scheme of things, we never care about 'sector'
> passed from zram_rw_page(). and this has worked for us for quite
> some time. my call would be -- let's drop zram_rw_page() `sector'
> calculation.
d'oh... s/sector/offset/g
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists