linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] slab: avoid IPIs when creating kmem caches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 17 Apr 2017 11:07:14 +0900
From:   Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>
To:     Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slab: avoid IPIs when creating kmem caches

On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 02:45:44PM -0700, Greg Thelen wrote:
> Each slab kmem cache has per cpu array caches.  The array caches are
> created when the kmem_cache is created, either via kmem_cache_create()
> or lazily when the first object is allocated in context of a kmem
> enabled memcg.  Array caches are replaced by writing to /proc/slabinfo.
> 
> Array caches are protected by holding slab_mutex or disabling
> interrupts.  Array cache allocation and replacement is done by
> __do_tune_cpucache() which holds slab_mutex and calls
> kick_all_cpus_sync() to interrupt all remote processors which confirms
> there are no references to the old array caches.
> 
> IPIs are needed when replacing array caches.  But when creating a new
> array cache, there's no need to send IPIs because there cannot be any
> references to the new cache.  Outside of memcg kmem accounting these
> IPIs occur at boot time, so they're not a problem.  But with memcg kmem
> accounting each container can create kmem caches, so the IPIs are
> wasteful.
> 
> Avoid unnecessary IPIs when creating array caches.
> 
> Test which reports the IPI count of allocating slab in 10000 memcg:
> 	import os
> 
> 	def ipi_count():
> 		with open("/proc/interrupts") as f:
> 			for l in f:
> 				if 'Function call interrupts' in l:
> 					return int(l.split()[1])
> 
> 	def echo(val, path):
> 		with open(path, "w") as f:
> 			f.write(val)
> 
> 	n = 10000
> 	os.chdir("/mnt/cgroup/memory")
> 	pid = str(os.getpid())
> 	a = ipi_count()
> 	for i in range(n):
> 		os.mkdir(str(i))
> 		echo("1G\n", "%d/memory.limit_in_bytes" % i)
> 		echo("1G\n", "%d/memory.kmem.limit_in_bytes" % i)
> 		echo(pid, "%d/cgroup.procs" % i)
> 		open("/tmp/x", "w").close()
> 		os.unlink("/tmp/x")
> 	b = ipi_count()
> 	print "%d loops: %d => %d (+%d ipis)" % (n, a, b, b-a)
> 	echo(pid, "cgroup.procs")
> 	for i in range(n):
> 		os.rmdir(str(i))
> 
> patched:   10000 loops: 1069 => 1170 (+101 ipis)
> unpatched: 10000 loops: 1192 => 48933 (+47741 ipis)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>

Acked-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>