[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANk1AXSOen7OWeJWc2GFDZe_ZEvjHonKvomw9ErrZu3RK17BJw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 10:35:01 -0500
From: Alan Tull <atull@...nel.org>
To: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>
Cc: "Luebbers, Enno" <enno.luebbers@...el.com>,
Moritz Fischer <moritz.fischer@...us.com>,
Wu Hao <hao.wu@...el.com>, linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Kang, Luwei" <luwei.kang@...el.com>,
"Zhang, Yi Z" <yi.z.zhang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] Intel FPGA Device Drivers
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com> wrote:
Hi Jerome,
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 12:48:17PM -0700, Luebbers, Enno wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:37:49AM -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>> > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 07:46:19AM -0700, Moritz Fischer wrote:
>> > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 6:29 AM, Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > It is like if on GPU we only had close source compiler for the GPU
>> > > > instructions set. So FPGA is definitly following different rules than
>> > > > open source upstream GPU kernel driver abides to.
Sorry, not a GPU guy, can you point me to something that documents
this policy of 'only opensource compilers for GPU'? I looked under
linux/Documentation and didn't see anything.
The current patchset doesn't have anything to do with FPGA toolchains
but you're using this patchset as a platform to talk about toolchain
issues.
It sounds like you are opposed to any kernel support of loading images
on FPGAs until all vendors have opensource toolchains.
Alan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists