[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4c51bf1a-00cb-84bb-f661-6bb6c83d8134@osg.samsung.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2017 19:10:21 -0600
From: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, pawel@...iak.com,
kyungmin.park@...sung.com, mchehab@...nel.org, will.deacon@....com,
Robin.Murphy@....com, jroedel@...e.de, bart.vanassche@...disk.com,
gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com, acourbot@...dia.com,
festevam@...il.com, krzk@...nel.org,
niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se, sricharan@...eaurora.org,
dledford@...hat.com, vinod.koul@...el.com,
andrew.smirnov@...il.com, mauricfo@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
alexander.h.duyck@...el.com, sagi@...mberg.me,
ming.l@....samsung.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
javier@...hile0.org, javier@....samsung.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: dma: fix sharing of coherent DMA memory without
struct page
On 04/14/2017 03:46 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 09:56:07AM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>>>> This would be however quite large task, especially taking into account
>>>> all current users of DMA-buf framework...
>>> Yeah it will be a large task.
>>
>> Maybe once scatterlist are switched to pfns, changing dmabuf internal
>> memory representation to pfn array might be much easier.
>
> Switching to a PFN array won't work either as we have no cross-arch
> way to translate PFNs to a DMA address and vice versa. Yes, we have
> them in ARM, but they are an _implementation detail_ of ARM's
> DMA API support, they are not for use by drivers.
>
> So, the very first problem that needs solving is this:
>
> How do we go from a coherent DMA allocation for device X to a set
> of DMA addresses for device Y.
>
> Essentially, we need a way of remapping the DMA buffer for use with
> another device, and returning a DMA address suitable for that device.
> This could well mean that we need to deal with setting up an IOMMU
> mapping. My guess is that this needs to happen at the DMA coherent
> API level - the DMA coherent API needs to be augmented with support
> for this. I'll call this "DMA coherent remap".
>
> We then need to think about how to pass this through the dma-buf API.
> dma_map_sg() is done by the exporter, who should know what kind of
> memory is being exported. The exporter can avoid calling dma_map_sg()
> if it knows in advance that it is exporting DMA coherent memory.
> Instead, the exporter can simply create a scatterlist with the DMA
> address and DMA length prepopulated with the results of the DMA
> coherent remap operation above.
The only way to conclusively say that it is coming from coherent area
is at the time it is getting allocated in dma_alloc_from_coherent().
Since dma_alloc_attrs() will go on to find memory from other areas if
dma_alloc_from_coherent() doesn't allocate memory.
dma_get_sgtable_attrs() is what is used by the exporter to create the
sg_table. One way to do this cleanly without needing to check buffer
type flags would be to add a set of sg_table ops: get_sgtable,
map_sg, and unmap_sg. Sounds like sg_table interfaces need to be in
dma_buf_ops level. More below.
>
> What the scatterlist can't carry in this case is a set of valid
> struct page pointers, and an importer must not walk the scatterlist
> expecting to get at the virtual address parameters or struct page
> pointers.
>
> On the mmap() side of things, remember that DMA coherent allocations
> may require special mapping into userspace, and which can only be
> mapped by the DMA coherent mmap support. kmap etc will also need to
> be different. So it probably makes sense for DMA coherent dma-buf
> exports to use a completely separate set of dma_buf_ops from the
> streaming version.
How about adding get_sgtable, map_sg, unmap_sg to dma_buf_ops. The right
ops need to be installed based on buffer type. As I mentioned before, we
don't know which memory we got until dma_alloc_from_coherent() finds
memory in dev->mem area. So how about using the dma_check_dev_coherent()
to determine which ops we need. These could be set based on buffer type.
vb2_dc_get_dmabuf() can do that.
I think this will work.
thanks,
-- Shuah
Powered by blists - more mailing lists