[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1492472726-3841-7-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 16:44:54 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, bobby.prani@...il.com,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 07/39] rcu: Semicolon inside RCU_TRACE() for tree.c
The current use of "RCU_TRACE(statement);" can cause odd bugs, especially
where "statement" is a local-variable declaration, as it can leave a
misplaced ";" in the source code. This commit therefore converts these
to "RCU_TRACE(statement;)", which avoids the misplaced ";".
Reported-by: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index df8f6401f2d5..e8843bf0f5e1 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -2793,14 +2793,14 @@ static void rcu_adopt_orphan_cbs(struct rcu_state *rsp, unsigned long flags)
*/
static void rcu_cleanup_dying_cpu(struct rcu_state *rsp)
{
- RCU_TRACE(unsigned long mask);
- RCU_TRACE(struct rcu_data *rdp = this_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda));
- RCU_TRACE(struct rcu_node *rnp = rdp->mynode);
+ RCU_TRACE(unsigned long mask;)
+ RCU_TRACE(struct rcu_data *rdp = this_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda);)
+ RCU_TRACE(struct rcu_node *rnp = rdp->mynode;)
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU))
return;
- RCU_TRACE(mask = rdp->grpmask);
+ RCU_TRACE(mask = rdp->grpmask;)
trace_rcu_grace_period(rsp->name,
rnp->gpnum + 1 - !!(rnp->qsmask & mask),
TPS("cpuofl"));
--
2.5.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists