linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] soc/tegra: pmc: Don't allocate struct tegra

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170417055035.GI28191@vireshk-i7>
Date:   Mon, 17 Apr 2017 11:20:35 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
Cc:     Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
        linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc/tegra: pmc: Don't allocate struct tegra_powergate on
 stack

On 21-03-17, 16:09, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 21-03-17, 10:37, Jon Hunter wrote:
> > 
> > On 21/03/17 05:24, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > The size of the struct tegra_powergate is quite big and if any more
> > > fields are added to the internal genpd structure, following warnings are
> > > thrown:
> > > 
> > > drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c:577:1: warning: the frame size of 1176 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
> > 
> > Hmmm ... AFAICT the size of the tegra_powergate struct is 312 bytes
> > (based upon next-20170321) and so it looks like something massive needs
> > to be added to the genpd struct to blow this up to over 1024 bytes. Are
> > there some genpd changes in-flight that are causing this?
> 
> https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=149000247329743&w=2
> 
> This is up for discussion right now though and we don't know if it
> will surely get merged or not.

@Jon: Regardless of the above series, do you want this patch to be merged as it
will still be better to avoid keeping large structures on stack.

Else I would be required to keep this in my above series from now on.

-- 
viresh