[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1492504480.2432.37.camel@pengutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 10:34:40 +0200
From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
To: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 03/10] mux: minimal mux subsystem and gpio-based mux
controller
Hi Peter,
On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 18:43 +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/include/linux/mux.h b/include/linux/mux.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..febdde4246df
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/mux.h
[...]
Consider separating mux.h into a consumer header and a driver header.
Right now there is no separation between the consumer API and the
framework internals.
regards
Philipp
Powered by blists - more mailing lists