[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87fuh6rqzd.fsf@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 10:43:12 +0100
From: Brendan Jackman <brendan.jackman@....com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Use policy-dependent transition delays
Hi Rafael,
On Fri, Apr 14 2017 at 22:51, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 11, 2017 12:20:41 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>>
>> Make the schedutil governor take the initial (default) value of the
>> rate_limit_us sysfs attribute from the (new) transition_delay_us
>> policy parameter (to be set by the scaling driver).
>>
>> That will allow scaling drivers to make schedutil use smaller default
>> values of rate_limit_us and reduce the default average time interval
>> between consecutive frequency changes.
>>
>> Make intel_pstate set transition_delay_us to 500.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>> ---
>>
>> This is a replacement for https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9671831/
>
> Any concerns about this one?
Sorry for the delay. This looked good to me.
Cheers
Brendan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists