[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1492501019.24567.45.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 10:36:59 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Mario.Limonciello@...l.com, pali.rohar@...il.com,
hdegoede@...hat.com
Cc: kernel@...pniu.pl, dvhart@...radead.org, rjw@...ysocki.net,
len.brown@...el.com, corentin.chary@...il.com, luto@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements
On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 15:40 +0000, Mario.Limonciello@...l.com wrote:
> > libsmbios would benefit.
> >
> > Really libsmbios matters here? Hans (added to thread) wrote that
> > libsmbios is
> > a relic, something of ages long gone by and a normal user should
> > never use it.
> >
>
> A normal user shouldn't be using it directly, but libsmbios is used by
> a few open
> source tools as a dependency. It's also used in many Dell
> manageability tools.
>
Shouldn't tools evolve to use newer interfaces (while keeping
compatibility with old kernels)?
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists