[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ef620d84-4517-9c9a-e883-fb1a4655ff88@suse.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 13:56:54 +0200
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org
Cc: boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 09/11] x86/xen: use capabilities instead of
fake cpuid values for xsave
On 18/04/17 12:02, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 18/04/17 07:31, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> @@ -281,22 +274,24 @@ static bool __init xen_check_mwait(void)
>> return false;
>> #endif
>> }
>> -static void __init xen_init_cpuid_mask(void)
>> +
>> +static bool __init xen_check_xsave(void)
>> {
>> - unsigned int ax, bx, cx, dx;
>> - unsigned int xsave_mask;
>> + unsigned int err, eax, edx;
>>
>> - ax = 1;
>> - cx = 0;
>> - cpuid(1, &ax, &bx, &cx, &dx);
>> + /* Test OSXSAVE capability via xgetbv instruction. */
>
> The code is fine, but this comment isn't going to be any help to people
> reading this code in 6 months time.
>
> How about this:
>
> "Xen 4.0 and older accidentally leaked the host XSAVE flag into guest
> view, despite not being able to support guests using the functionality.
> Probe for the actual availability of XSAVE by seeing whether xgetbv
> executes successfully or raises #UD."
I'll update the comment.
> Everything else is fine, so Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper
> <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>
Thanks,
Juergen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists