linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2] mm/madvise: Move up the behavior parameter validation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <c9428299-543c-128f-b7c6-71669a1aa20e@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Tue, 18 Apr 2017 08:16:53 +0530
From:   Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
        Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] mm/madvise: Move up the behavior parameter validation

On 04/17/2017 10:57 AM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 07:21:41PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> The madvise_behavior_valid() function should be called before
>> acting upon the behavior parameter. Hence move up the function.
>> This also includes MADV_SOFT_OFFLINE and MADV_HWPOISON options
>> as valid behavior parameter for the system call madvise().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in V2:
>>
>> Added CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE check before using MADV_SOFT_OFFLINE
>> and MADV_HWPOISONE constants.
>>
>>  mm/madvise.c | 9 +++++++--
>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
>> index efd4721..ccff186 100644
>> --- a/mm/madvise.c
>> +++ b/mm/madvise.c
>> @@ -694,6 +694,10 @@ static int madvise_inject_error(int behavior,
>>  #endif
>>  	case MADV_DONTDUMP:
>>  	case MADV_DODUMP:
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE
>> +	case MADV_SOFT_OFFLINE:
>> +	case MADV_HWPOISON:
>> +#endif
>>  		return true;
>>  
>>  	default:
>> @@ -767,12 +771,13 @@ static int madvise_inject_error(int behavior,
>>  	size_t len;
>>  	struct blk_plug plug;
>>  
>> +	if (!madvise_behavior_valid(behavior))
>> +		return error;
>> +
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE
>>  	if (behavior == MADV_HWPOISON || behavior == MADV_SOFT_OFFLINE)
>>  		return madvise_inject_error(behavior, start, start + len_in);
>>  #endif
>> -	if (!madvise_behavior_valid(behavior))
>> -		return error;
> 
> Hi Anshuman,
> 
> I'm wondering why current code calls madvise_inject_error() at the beginning
> of SYSCALL_DEFINE3(madvise), without any boundary checks of address or length.
> I agree to checking madvise_behavior_valid for MADV_{HWPOISON,SOFT_OFFLINE},
> but checking boundary of other arguments is also helpful, so how about moving
> down the existing #ifdef block like below?

Sure, will fold both the patches together and send it out.