[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2ab64334-d8cd-5594-112b-42c0bd7e4d2d@suse.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 15:56:10 +0200
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
Julien Grall <julien.grall@....com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Ross Lagerwall <ross.lagerwall@...rix.com>,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@...zon.com>,
KarimAllah Ahmed <karahmed@...zon.de>
Subject: Re: [stable-4.10: PATCH] xen: revert commits 72a9b186292 and
da72ff5bfcb0
On 18/04/17 15:52, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 06:55:54PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 06:28:33PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> On 13/04/17 18:24, Greg KH wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 04:49:49PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>>>> Revert commit 72a9b186292 ("xen: Remove event channel notification
>>>>> through Xen PCI platform device") as the original analysis was wrong
>>>>> that all the removed code isn't in use any more. As commit da72ff5bfcb0
>>>>> ("partially revert xen: Remove event channel notification through Xen
>>>>> PCI platform device") reverted already some parts of it revert this
>>>>> commit, too.
>>>>>
>>>>> It is still necessary for old Xen versions (< 4.0) and for being able
>>>>> to run the Linux kernel as dom0 in a nested Xen environment.
>>>>
>>>> Is there a commit in Linus's tree that matches this revert as well?
>>>
>>> Not yet. I'm working on it.
>>
>> I'd prefer to take the same exact commit please. That way nothing
>> diverges here.
>
> Especially as you are asking to revert patches that are already in
> releases and have been out for a while. Always get fixes into Linus's
> tree first, and _then_ we can add them to stable releases.
>
> I'm dropping this request, and the one for 4.9, from my stable "todo"
> list.
Okay. I'll come back when the revert is in Linus' tree.
Sorry for the noise,
Juergen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists