linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 0/8] Copy Offload with Peer-to-Peer PCI Memory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1cdeee61-2107-a392-4e5e-77a6aa10354f@deltatee.com>
Date:   Tue, 18 Apr 2017 14:48:03 -0600
From:   Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
To:     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>
Cc:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>,
        Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>,
        Max Gurtovoy <maxg@...lanox.com>,
        Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...1.01.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/8] Copy Offload with Peer-to-Peer PCI Memory



On 18/04/17 02:31 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 12:35 PM, Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 18/04/17 01:01 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>>>> Ultimately every dma_ops will need special code to support P2P with
>>>>> the special hardware that ops is controlling, so it makes some sense
>>>>> to start by pushing the check down there in the first place. This
>>>>> advice is partially motivated by how dma_map_sg is just a small
>>>>> wrapper around the function pointer call...
>>>>
>>>> Yes, I noticed this problem too and that makes sense. It just means
>>>> every dma_ops will probably need to be modified to either support p2p
>>>> pages or fail on them. Though, the only real difficulty there is that it
>>>> will be a lot of work.
>>>
>>> I don't think you need to go touch all dma_ops, I think you can just
>>> arrange for devices that are going to do dma to get redirected to a
>>> p2p aware provider of operations that overrides the system default
>>> dma_ops. I.e. just touch get_dma_ops().
>>
>> This would not work well for everyone, for instance on GPU we usualy
>> have buffer object with a mix of device memory and regular system
>> memory but call dma sg map once for the list.
>>
> 
> ...and that dma_map goes through get_dma_ops(), so I don't see the conflict?

The main conflict is in dma_map_sg which only does get_dma_ops once but
the sg may contain memory of different types.

Logan