[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5a0d1cd7-dbeb-be2e-e966-e4e661408132@kernel.dk>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 13:34:12 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Fabio Checconi <fchecconi@...il.com>,
Arianna Avanzini <avanzini.arianna@...il.com>,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
Linux-Kernal <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, broonie@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 00/16] Introduce the BFQ I/O scheduler
On 04/19/2017 01:05 PM, Paolo Valente wrote:
>
>> Il giorno 19 apr 2017, alle ore 16:33, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> ha scritto:
>>
>> On 04/19/2017 03:23 AM, Paolo Valente wrote:
>>>
>>>> Il giorno 12 apr 2017, alle ore 18:23, Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org> ha scritto:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>> new patch series, addressing (both) issues raised by Bart [1], and
>>>> with block/Makefile fixed as suggested by Bart [2].
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Jens,
>>> apparently no complain of any sort on this last series. Do you think
>>> we could make it for 4.12, or shall we aim at 4.13?
>>
>> We may as well queue it up now, I don't think there's much point in
>> deferring an extra cycle.
>>
>
> A little scary, but (of course) fine for me.
Reaching the culmination of having your big project merged after
a long time is always a little scary. For now, kick back and open
a Tignanello, and brace yourself for tending to potential bug
reports once the 4.12 merge window opens.
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists