[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170419201120.GA17351@fury>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 13:11:20 -0700
From: Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
To: Carlo Caione <carlo@...one.org>
Cc: andy@...radead.org, andy.shevchenko@...il.com,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux@...lessm.com, Carlo Caione <carlo@...lessm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] hp-wmi: Do not shadow error values
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 07:41:53PM +0200, Carlo Caione wrote:
> From: Carlo Caione <carlo@...lessm.com>
>
> All the helper functions (i.e. hp_wmi_dock_state, hp_wmi_tablet_state,
> ...) using hp_wmi_perform_query to perform an HP WMI query shadow the
> returned value in case of error.
>
> We return -EINVAL only when the HP WMI query returns a positive value
> (the specific error code) to not mix this up with the actual value
> returned by the helper function.
So Andy is correct in that we try to avoid shadowing error codes where possible.
I accepted v1 of this series because it fixed an existing problem in a way
consistent with the existing code.
Since v1 is already in for-next, let's consider the following a subsequent
cleanup. Would you please create a new patch to address the shadowing error code
issues on top of the v1 patch series.
Thanks,
--
Darren Hart
VMware Open Source Technology Center
Powered by blists - more mailing lists