[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1704191623540.48310@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 16:24:48 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [patch] mm, vmscan: avoid thrashing anon lru when free + file
is low
On Wed, 19 Apr 2017, Minchan Kim wrote:
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 24efcc20af91..5d2f3fa41e92 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -2174,8 +2174,17 @@ static void get_scan_count(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> }
>
> if (unlikely(pgdatfile + pgdatfree <= total_high_wmark)) {
> - scan_balance = SCAN_ANON;
> - goto out;
> + /*
> + * force SCAN_ANON if inactive anonymous LRU lists of
> + * eligible zones are enough pages. Otherwise, thrashing
> + * can be happen on the small anonymous LRU list.
> + */
> + if (!inactive_list_is_low(lruvec, false, NULL, sc, false) &&
> + lruvec_lru_size(lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_ANON, sc->reclaim_idx)
> + >> sc->priority) {
> + scan_balance = SCAN_ANON;
> + goto out;
> + }
> }
> }
>
Hi Minchan,
This looks good and it correctly biases against SCAN_ANON for my workload
that was thrashing the anon lrus. Feel free to use parts of my changelog
if you'd like.
Tested-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists