[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170419082317.GA27829@leverpostej>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 09:23:18 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
"Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bus: arm-ccn: Use devm_kcalloc() in arm_ccn_probe()
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 09:29:24AM +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 09:12:43 +0200
>
> Multiplications for the size determination of memory allocations
> indicated that array data structures should be processed.
> Thus use the corresponding function "devm_kcalloc".
>
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
This looks reasonable to me. FWIW:
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
I'll leave the final say to Pawel.
Mark.
> ---
> drivers/bus/arm-ccn.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/arm-ccn.c b/drivers/bus/arm-ccn.c
> index 4d6a2b7e4d3f..6375bda0b2a1 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/arm-ccn.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/arm-ccn.c
> @@ -1520,10 +1520,10 @@ static int arm_ccn_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (err)
> return err;
>
> - ccn->node = devm_kzalloc(ccn->dev, sizeof(*ccn->node) * ccn->num_nodes,
> - GFP_KERNEL);
> - ccn->xp = devm_kzalloc(ccn->dev, sizeof(*ccn->node) * ccn->num_xps,
> - GFP_KERNEL);
> + ccn->node = devm_kcalloc(ccn->dev, ccn->num_nodes, sizeof(*ccn->node),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + ccn->xp = devm_kcalloc(ccn->dev, ccn->num_xps, sizeof(*ccn->node),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!ccn->node || !ccn->xp)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> --
> 2.12.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists