[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170419085258.jlfwmhure5anayff@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 10:52:58 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch V2 08/10] timer: Implement the hierarchical pull model
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 01:11:10PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> + raw_spin_lock_nested(&parent->lock, parent->level);
> + raw_spin_lock_nested(&group->lock, group->level);
> + raw_spin_lock_nested(&group->lock, group->level);
An not a comment on the locking order and why this annotation isn't
borken.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists