[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1492594081.15137.0.camel@nxp.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 12:28:01 +0300
From: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
CC: Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Robin Gong <yibin.gong@....com>,
Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>,
"Irina Tirdea" <irina.tirdea@....com>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@....com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] ARM: imx: Set LDO regulator supply
On Tue, 2017-04-04 at 20:04 +0300, Leonard Crestez wrote:
> Setting the LDO regulator parent is optional but beneficial. It will cause
> the PMIC output voltage to be dynamically set to the minimum input for the
> LDOs, this should be more efficient.
>
> This propagation was introduced by:
> commit fc42112c0eaa ("regulator: core: Propagate voltage changes to supply
> regulators")
>
> Changes since v1:
> * Drop patch 1 since it only avoids logging a warning and the gpc driver
> is going through more changes.
> * Initialize cpufreq->suspend_freq based on policy->max instead.
> * Remove reference to ldo-bypass from suspend_freq patch message.
Hello,
This is a gentle reminder that this was sent ~2 weeks ago and patches 1
and 2 are still waiting (with no objections). Patches 3/4 were applied.
--
Regards,
Leonard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists