linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/9] Unify i2c_mux_add

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 19 Apr 2017 07:29:39 -0300
From:   Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>
To:     Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
Cc:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Peter Korsgaard <peter.korsgaard@...co.com>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] Unify i2c_mux_add_adapter error reporting

Em Mon, 3 Apr 2017 13:27:48 +0200
Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se> escreveu:

> On 2017-04-03 12:27, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 10:38:29AM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:  
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> Many users of the i2c_mux_add_adapter interface log a message
> >> on failure, but the function already logs such a message. One
> >> or two of those users actually add more information than already
> >> provided by the central failure message.
> >>
> >> So, first fix the central error reporting to provide as much
> >> information as any current user, and then remove the surplus
> >> error reporting at the call sites.  
> > 
> > Yes, I like.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>  
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> BTW, the improved error reporting in patch 1/9 is not needed for
> patches 8/9 and 9/9 to make sense, the existing central error
> message is already good enough. So, iio and media maintainers,
> feel free to just grab those two patches. Or, they can go via
> Wolfram and the i2c tree with the rest of the series. Either way
> is fine with me, just let me know.

Feel free to submit via I2C tree, together with the patch series:

Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>

> 
> Cheers,
> peda



Thanks,
Mauro