[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170419112845.3rt3zlyzuzert647@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 13:28:45 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, rostedt@...dmis.org,
dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, dvhart@...ux.intel.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, bobby.prani@...il.com,
marc.zyngier@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 0/13] Miscellaneous fixes for 4.12
So the thing Maz complained about is because KVM assumes
synchronize_srcu() is 'free' when there is no srcu_read_lock() activity.
This series 'breaks' that.
I've not looked hard enough at the new SRCU to see if its possible to
re-instate that feature.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists