linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] ftrace: Add 'function-fork' trace option (v2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170418212553.1033d730@grimm.local.home>
Date:   Tue, 18 Apr 2017 21:25:53 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kernel-team@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] ftrace: Add 'function-fork' trace option (v2)

On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 09:27:28 +0900
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:

> Hi Steve,
> 
> Sorry for little late,
> 
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 4:18 AM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 11:44:26 +0900
> > Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
> >  
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> This patchset add 'function-fork' option to function tracer which
> >> makes pid filter to be inherited like 'event-fork' does.  During the
> >> test, I found a bug of pid filter on an instance directory.  The patch
> >> 1 fixes it and maybe it should go to the stable tree.  
> >
> > Hmm, are the other patches dependent on it?  
> 
> Nop, but there will be a small clash on trace.h for the declaration.

Yep, I push up a merge with mainline with my linux-next branch to cover
the conflicts. I'll let Linus know about it too when I do my pull
request in the merge window.

> 
> >
> > I think I may just push it separately to Linus now, but the other
> > patches will be on my devel branch which will not be abased off of this
> > fix. Will that break too much? I just cherry-picked a patch from my
> > urgent branch as it required to be on my devel branch and go to Linus.  
> 
> I don't think it breaks much.

Except that your test triggers the bug it uncovered ;-)

-- Steve

> 
> >
> > Hmm, I may be able to make a separate branch with this. I have to see
> > how much it conflicts with my current development.