[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170419130245.GJ3956@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 06:02:45 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, rostedt@...dmis.org,
dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, dvhart@...ux.intel.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, bobby.prani@...il.com,
marc.zyngier@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 0/13] Miscellaneous fixes for 4.12
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 01:28:45PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> So the thing Maz complained about is because KVM assumes
> synchronize_srcu() is 'free' when there is no srcu_read_lock() activity.
> This series 'breaks' that.
>
> I've not looked hard enough at the new SRCU to see if its possible to
> re-instate that feature.
And with the fix I gave Maz, the parallelized version is near enough
to being free as well. It was just a stupid bug on my part: I forgot
to check for expedited when scheduling callbacks.
Thanx, Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists