linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 4/7] perf report: Refactor the branch info printing code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170419141531.GD19643@krava>
Date:   Wed, 19 Apr 2017 16:15:31 +0200
From:   Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:     Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     acme@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
        mingo@...hat.com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
        Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
        kan.liang@...el.com, yao.jin@...el.com,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/7] perf report: Refactor the branch info printing
 code

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 11:48:11PM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:

SNIP

>  static int counts_str_build(char *bf, int bfsize,
>  			     u64 branch_count, u64 predicted_count,
>  			     u64 abort_count, u64 cycles_count,
>  			     u64 iter_count, u64 samples_count)
>  {
> -	double predicted_percent = 0.0;
> -	const char *null_str = "";
> -	char iter_str[32];
> -	char cycle_str[32];
> -	char *istr, *cstr;
>  	u64 cycles;
> +	int printed = 0, i = 0;
>  
>  	if (branch_count == 0)
>  		return scnprintf(bf, bfsize, " (calltrace)");
>  
>  	cycles = cycles_count / branch_count;
> +	if (cycles)
> +		printed += count_pri64_printf(i++, "cycles",
> +				cycles,
> +				bf + printed, bfsize - printed);
>  
> -	if (iter_count && samples_count) {
> -		if (cycles > 0)
> -			scnprintf(iter_str, sizeof(iter_str),
> -				 " iterations:%" PRId64 "",
> -				 iter_count / samples_count);
> -		else
> -			scnprintf(iter_str, sizeof(iter_str),
> -				 "iterations:%" PRId64 "",
> -				 iter_count / samples_count);
> -		istr = iter_str;
> -	} else
> -		istr = (char *)null_str;
> -
> -	if (cycles > 0) {
> -		scnprintf(cycle_str, sizeof(cycle_str),
> -			  "cycles:%" PRId64 "", cycles);
> -		cstr = cycle_str;
> -	} else
> -		cstr = (char *)null_str;
> +	if (iter_count && samples_count)
> +		printed += count_pri64_printf(i++, "iterations",
> +				iter_count / samples_count,
> +				bf + printed, bfsize - printed);

please put the multiline condition code into {} brackets
for all of the cases in this function

thanks,
jirka