linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V4 00/16] Introduce the BFQ I/O scheduler

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 19 Apr 2017 08:33:21 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:     Fabio Checconi <fchecconi@...il.com>,
        Arianna Avanzini <avanzini.arianna@...il.com>,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux-Kernal <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, broonie@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 00/16] Introduce the BFQ I/O scheduler

On 04/19/2017 03:23 AM, Paolo Valente wrote:
> 
>> Il giorno 12 apr 2017, alle ore 18:23, Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org> ha scritto:
>>
>> Hi,
>> new patch series, addressing (both) issues raised by Bart [1], and
>> with block/Makefile fixed as suggested by Bart [2].
>>
> 
> Hi Jens,
> apparently no complain of any sort on this last series.  Do you think
> we could make it for 4.12, or shall we aim at 4.13?

We may as well queue it up now, I don't think there's much point in
deferring an extra cycle.

-- 
Jens Axboe