lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170419141619.220497997@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Wed, 19 Apr 2017 16:43:12 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 56/69] nbd: use loff_t for blocksize and nbd_set_size args

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>

commit ef77b515243b3499d62cf446eda6ca7e0a0b079c upstream.

If we have large devices (say like the 40t drive I was trying to test with) we
will end up overflowing the int arguments to nbd_set_size and not get the right
size for our device.  Fix this by using loff_t everywhere so I don't have to
think about this again.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>
[bwh: Backported to 4.9: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/block/nbd.c |    8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/block/nbd.c
+++ b/drivers/block/nbd.c
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ struct nbd_device {
 
 	struct mutex tx_lock;
 	struct gendisk *disk;
-	int blksize;
+	loff_t blksize;
 	loff_t bytesize;
 
 	/* protects initialization and shutdown of the socket */
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ static void nbd_size_update(struct nbd_d
 }
 
 static int nbd_size_set(struct nbd_device *nbd, struct block_device *bdev,
-			int blocksize, int nr_blocks)
+			loff_t blocksize, loff_t nr_blocks)
 {
 	int ret;
 
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ static int nbd_size_set(struct nbd_devic
 		return ret;
 
 	nbd->blksize = blocksize;
-	nbd->bytesize = (loff_t)blocksize * (loff_t)nr_blocks;
+	nbd->bytesize = blocksize * nr_blocks;
 
 	nbd_size_update(nbd, bdev);
 
@@ -817,7 +817,7 @@ static int nbd_dev_dbg_init(struct nbd_d
 	debugfs_create_file("tasks", 0444, dir, nbd, &nbd_dbg_tasks_ops);
 	debugfs_create_u64("size_bytes", 0444, dir, &nbd->bytesize);
 	debugfs_create_u32("timeout", 0444, dir, &nbd->tag_set.timeout);
-	debugfs_create_u32("blocksize", 0444, dir, &nbd->blksize);
+	debugfs_create_u64("blocksize", 0444, dir, &nbd->blksize);
 	debugfs_create_file("flags", 0444, dir, nbd, &nbd_dbg_flags_ops);
 
 	return 0;


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ