[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170419141618.152165624@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 16:42:45 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Fam Zheng <famz@...hat.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 29/69] scsi: sd: Consider max_xfer_blocks if opt_xfer_blocks is unusable
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Fam Zheng <famz@...hat.com>
commit 6780414519f91c2a84da9baa963a940ac916f803 upstream.
If device reports a small max_xfer_blocks and a zero opt_xfer_blocks, we
end up using BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS, which is wrong and r/w of that size
may get error.
[mkp: tweaked to avoid setting rw_max twice and added typecast]
Fixes: ca369d51b3e ("block/sd: Fix device-imposed transfer length limits")
Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/scsi/sd.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
@@ -2877,7 +2877,8 @@ static int sd_revalidate_disk(struct gen
q->limits.io_opt = logical_to_bytes(sdp, sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks);
rw_max = logical_to_sectors(sdp, sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks);
} else
- rw_max = BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS;
+ rw_max = min_not_zero(logical_to_sectors(sdp, dev_max),
+ (sector_t)BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS);
/* Combine with controller limits */
q->limits.max_sectors = min(rw_max, queue_max_hw_sectors(q));
Powered by blists - more mailing lists