[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170418224657.1b7ed057@grimm.local.home>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 22:46:57 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
Cc: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, nfont@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
mpe@...erman.id.au, mingo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: introduce event tracepoints for dynamic device_node
lifecyle
On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 17:07:17 -0700
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com> wrote:
> As far as I know, there is no easy way to combine trace data and printk()
> style data to create a single chronology of events. If some of the
> information needed to debug an issue is trace data and some is printk()
> style data then it becomes more difficult to understand the overall
> situation.
You mean like:
# echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/printk/console/enable
Makes all printks also go into the ftrace ring buffer.
-- Steve
>
> If Rob wants to convert printk() style data to trace data (and I can't
> convince him otherwise) then I will have further comments on this specific
> patch.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists