linux-kernel - Re: RFC: drop the T10 OSD code and its users

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170419151144.GA22579@kernel.dk>
Date:   Wed, 19 Apr 2017 09:11:45 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     ooo@...ctrozaur.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
        trond.myklebust@...marydata.com, osd-dev@...n-osd.org,
        linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: drop the T10 OSD code and its users

On Wed, Apr 12 2017, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The only real user of the T10 OSD protocol, the pNFS object layout
> driver never went to the point of having shipping products, and the
> other two users (osdblk and exofs) were simple example of it's usage.
> 
> The code has been mostly unmaintained for years and is getting in the
> way of block / SCSI changes, so I think it's finally time to drop it.
> 
> These patches are against Jens' block for-next tree as that already

I've added 1/4 for now, as that one should obviously go. If we have
consensus to kill the rest, I'm all for it.

-- 
Jens Axboe