[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <58F6D588.2050402@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 20:12:08 -0700
From: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, nfont@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
mpe@...erman.id.au, mingo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: introduce event tracepoints for dynamic device_node
lifecyle
On 04/18/17 19:46, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 17:07:17 -0700
> Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com> wrote:
>
>
>> As far as I know, there is no easy way to combine trace data and printk()
>> style data to create a single chronology of events. If some of the
>> information needed to debug an issue is trace data and some is printk()
>> style data then it becomes more difficult to understand the overall
>> situation.
>
> You mean like:
>
> # echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/printk/console/enable
>
> Makes all printks also go into the ftrace ring buffer.
Thanks! I was hoping there was going to be an easy answer like this.
> -- Steve
>
>>
>> If Rob wants to convert printk() style data to trace data (and I can't
>> convince him otherwise) then I will have further comments on this specific
>> patch.
>>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists