linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the rcu tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170419040620.GI3956@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Tue, 18 Apr 2017 21:06:20 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the rcu tree

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 01:50:16PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> 
> After merging the rcu tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> failed like this:
> 
> kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c: In function 'rcu_torture_stats_print':
> kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c:1369:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'srcutorture_get_gp_data' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>    srcutorture_get_gp_data(cur_ops->ttype, srcu_ctlp,
>    ^
> 
> Caused by commit
> 
>   b4d55cac0a93 ("srcu: Make rcutorture writer stalls print SRCU GP state")
> 
> This config has CONFIG_CLASSIC_SRCU=y and CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST=m, so
> CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST is not defined - CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST_MODULE
> is defined.  You probably want to protect srcutorture_get_gp_data() with
> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST) instead.
> 
> I have used the rcu tree from next-20170418 for today.

Please accept my apologies!  I forgot about the state of -rcu while
chasing another bug, and only a few minutes ago made the transition
from "Why doesn't this code work?" to "Why didn't my brain work?".  :-/

Will be fixed for tomorrow's -next.  Or at least broken in a more subtle
and creative way.  ;-)

							Thanx, Paul