linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] clk: imx7d: fix USDHC NAND clock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170419164439.GG7065@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Wed, 19 Apr 2017 09:44:39 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To:     Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
Cc:     shawnguo@...nel.org, kernel@...gutronix.de, aisheng.dong@....com,
        fabio.estevam@....com, robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] clk: imx7d: fix USDHC NAND clock

On 04/19, Stefan Agner wrote:
> On 2017-04-19 09:14, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > On 04/10, Stefan Agner wrote:
> >> The USDHC NAND root clock is not gated by any CCM clock gate. Remove
> >> the bogus gate definition.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
> >> ---
> > 
> > Can this be applied? It's followed by a dtsi change and there is
> > zero information about if the two depend on each other. Please
> > add cover letters for these sorts of things in the future
> > indicating how you expect merging to work.
> 
> This can be merged. The two changes are independent.
> 
> They look kind of dependent, but really aren't since
> IMX7D_NAND_USDHC_BUS_ROOT_CLK is still in the init_on list. Should have
> explicitly mentioned that, sorry about that.
> 

Thanks. Applied to clk-next.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project