[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170419052206.GA5436@vireshk-i7>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 10:52:06 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
Javi Merino <javi.merino@...nel.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@...il.com>,
Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 00/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: improve interaction with
cpufreq core
On 18-04-17, 15:40, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> Hi Viresh,
>
> I have checkout your branch at newest commit:
> 908063832c268f8add94
> I have built it and run it on my Juno r2.
> I have some python tests for IPA and I run one of them.
>
> I seen a few issues so I have created a patch just
> to be able to run IPA.
> My next email will have the patch so you can see the changes.
>
> IPA does not work with this patch set.
> I have tested two source codes from your repo:
> 1. your change 908063832c268f8add94
> 2. your base 8f506e0faf4e2a4a0bde9f9b1
>
> In case 1. IPA does not work - temperature rises to 83degC
> in case 2. works - temperature is limited to 65degC.
Yeah, there were some cases power specific cases that weren't covered in my
tests and thanks a lot for testing it out. I have pushed my branch again and it
has all your fixes (a bit refined) in it.
> On Monday I can allocate more time for it.
My branch should just work now. Please see if you can allocate 10-15 min today
to give it a try, so that we can get it in earlier. I will send a V3 today and
your Tested-by would be very much appreciated.
Thanks Lukasz.
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists