[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1492624001.2543.9.camel@sandisk.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 17:46:43 +0000
From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@...disk.com>
To: "sfr@...b.auug.org.au" <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>
CC: "jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"ooo@...ctrozaur.com" <ooo@...ctrozaur.com>,
"dan.carpenter@...cle.com" <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"bhalevy@...marydata.com" <bhalevy@...marydata.com>,
"martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: osd_uld: fix mismerge
On Wed, 2017-04-19 at 19:44 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Fixes: c02465fa13b6 ("scsi: osd_uld: Check scsi_device_get() return value")
> Fixes: ac1ddc584e98 ("scsi: utilize new cdev_device_add helper function")
Hello Arnd,
Both these patches are fine as far as I can tell. Shouldn't the
"Fixes" tag refer to the merge commit instead of to the commits
that have been merged?
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists