linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] nvme APST quirk updates, take two

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cea93058-eb0f-b8cc-0fe3-08f39e7cf04b@kernel.dk>
Date:   Thu, 20 Apr 2017 17:30:23 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>,
        linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
        Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] nvme APST quirk updates, take two

On 04/20/2017 02:37 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Hi Jens-
> 
> These are just the quirk updates, split out.  The patches are
> unchanged.
> 
> I think that, even if we want to apply a broader quirk for 4.11, we
> should still apply these so that we can cleanly revert the broader
> quirk later.  IOW, let's get the known regressions fixed before we
> get too excited about the unknown regressions.

Applied - and I agree, we should still do this and if we do a
default-off type of patch, then we can easily revert that one
on its own for 4.12.

-- 
Jens Axboe