[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170420065028.GA3847@bbox>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 15:50:28 +0900
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
CC: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@....com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Subject: Re: copy_page() on a kmalloc-ed page with DEBUG_SLAB enabled (was
"zram: do not use copy_page with non-page alinged address")
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 10:45:42AM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (04/19/17 04:51), Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> [..]
> > > > > Another approach is the API does normal thing for non-aligned prefix and
> > > > > tail space and fast thing for aligned space.
> > > > > Otherwise, it would be happy if the API has WARN_ON non-page SIZE aligned
> > > > > address.
> >
> > Why not just use memcpy()? Is copy_page() significantly faster than
> > memcpy() for a PAGE_SIZE amount of data?
>
> that's a good point.
>
> I was going to ask yesterday - do we even need copy_page()? arch that
> provides well optimized copy_page() quite likely provides somewhat
> equally optimized memcpy(). so may be copy_page() is not even needed?
I don't know.
Just I found https://download.samba.org/pub/paulus/ols-2003-presentation.pdf
and heard https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/4/10/1270.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists