[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170420063557.837586897@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 08:34:56 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Li Qiang <liqiang6-s@....cn>,
Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@...are.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.18 021/124] drm/vmwgfx: fix integer overflow in vmw_surface_define_ioctl()
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Li Qiang <liq3ea@...il.com>
commit e7e11f99564222d82f0ce84bd521e57d78a6b678 upstream.
In vmw_surface_define_ioctl(), the 'num_sizes' is the sum of the
'req->mip_levels' array. This array can be assigned any value from
the user space. As both the 'num_sizes' and the array is uint32_t,
it is easy to make 'num_sizes' overflow. The later 'mip_levels' is
used as the loop count. This can lead an oob write. Add the check of
'req->mip_levels' to avoid this.
Signed-off-by: Li Qiang <liqiang6-s@....cn>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@...are.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_surface.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_surface.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_surface.c
@@ -708,8 +708,11 @@ int vmw_surface_define_ioctl(struct drm_
128;
num_sizes = 0;
- for (i = 0; i < DRM_VMW_MAX_SURFACE_FACES; ++i)
+ for (i = 0; i < DRM_VMW_MAX_SURFACE_FACES; ++i) {
+ if (req->mip_levels[i] > DRM_VMW_MAX_MIP_LEVELS)
+ return -EINVAL;
num_sizes += req->mip_levels[i];
+ }
if (num_sizes > DRM_VMW_MAX_SURFACE_FACES * DRM_VMW_MAX_MIP_LEVELS ||
num_sizes == 0)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists