linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8] nvme: improve performance for virtual NVMe devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3615ff57-543d-6e51-6eea-a9e981036446@grimberg.me>
Date:   Thu, 20 Apr 2017 13:22:24 +0300
From:   Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
To:     Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
        Helen Koike <helen.koike@...labora.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, fes@...gle.com,
        axboe@...com, rlnelson@...gle.com,
        "open list : NVM EXPRESS DRIVER" <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
        mikew@...gle.com, digitaleric@...gle.com, monish@...gle.com,
        "james_p_freyensee @ linux . intel . com" 
        <james_p_freyensee@...ux.intel.com>, tytso@....edu,
        mlin@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8] nvme: improve performance for virtual NVMe devices

>> + Add missing maintainers from scripts/get_maintainer.pl in the email thread
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to know if it would be possible to get this patch for kernel
>> 4.12.
>> Should I send a pull request? Or do you usually get the patch from the email
>> thread?
>
> Hi Helen,
>
> This looks good to me. I pulled this into a branch for the next merge
> window here:
>
> http://git.infradead.org/nvme.git/shortlog/refs/heads/for-next
>
> There's only one other commit at the moment in addition to yours, so
> I'll just need to make sure we've got everything we want for 4.12 before
> submitting our next pull request.

I'm fine with this too.