linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL 00/28] perf/core fixes and cleanups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170420112926.iofvu5j4fi3llx6y@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 20 Apr 2017 13:29:26 +0200
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
        Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@...aro.org>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 00/28] perf/core fixes and cleanups


* Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> wrote:

> Em Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 10:10:49AM +0200, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
> > * Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> wrote:
> > Pulled, thanks a lot Arnaldo!
> > 
> > > For this specific pull request the samples/bpf/ was disabled, as 'make headers_install'
> > > is failing with the following error, in this case in fedora:rawhide:
> > >   
> > >     INSTALL usr/include/uapi/ (0 file)
> > >   /git/linux/scripts/Makefile.headersinst:62: *** Missing generated UAPI file 
> > ./arch/x86/include/generated/uapi/asm/unistd_32.h.  Stop.
> > >   make[1]: *** [/git/linux/Makefile:1151: headers_install] Error 2
> > >   make[1]: Leaving directory '/tmp/build/linux'
> > >   make: *** [Makefile:152: sub-make] Error 2
> > >   make: Leaving directory '/git/linux'
> > 
> > Beyond this build fix,
> 
> I haven't checked this lately, will do, hopefully this was already taken
> care of by someone dealing with the headers_install code.

Ah, sorry, I thought it's a problem introduced by perf - if it's an existing 
upstream bug then never mind!

Thanks,

	Ingo