linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] staging: ccree: introduce CryptoCell HW driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 20 Apr 2017 16:01:03 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com>
Cc:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        Binoy Jayan <binoy.jayan@...aro.org>,
        Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad.benyossef@....com>,
        Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, Ofir Drang <ofir.drang@....com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] staging: ccree: introduce CryptoCell HW driver

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 04:40:56PM +0300, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 04:12:55PM +0300, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
> >> +++ b/drivers/staging/ccree/bsp.h
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
> >> +/*
> >> + * Copyright (C) 2012-2016 ARM Limited or its affiliates.
> >> + *
> >> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
> >> + * under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free
> >> + * Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option)
> >> + * any later version.
> >
> > Oh, I have to ask, do you really mean "any later version" here and
> > elsewhere?
> >
> > If so, then your MODULE_LICENSE() marking is wrong, please fix that up,
> > or fix up the license text, I can't take incompatible ones without
> > getting angry emails from legal people sent to me...
> >
> 
> Thanks for noticing this.
> 
> The copyright + license notice is a boilerplate I got from the powers
> that be here.
> 
> I'll consult internally what is the proper action. I don't want to
> make legal mad either... :-)

Ok, I'll drop this patch series then, and wait for an updated one with
this fixed up.

thanks,

greg k-h