[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170420141229.a3qran4agt24iczc@rob-hp-laptop>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 09:12:29 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Kochetkov <al.kochet@...il.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Huang Tao <huangtao@...k-chips.com>,
Caesar Wang <wxt@...k-chips.com>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Rockchip SoC support"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC support"
<linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/29] dt-bindings: Clarify compatible property for
rockchip timers
On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 10:27:12PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> From: Alexander Kochetkov <al.kochet@...il.com>
>
> Make all properties description in form '"rockchip,<chip>-timer",
> "rockchip,rk3288-timer"' for all chips found in linux kernel.
>
> Suggested-by: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kochetkov <al.kochet@...il.com>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/timer/rockchip,rk-timer.txt | 12 +++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/rockchip,rk-timer.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/rockchip,rk-timer.txt
> index a41b184..16a5f45 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/rockchip,rk-timer.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/rockchip,rk-timer.txt
> @@ -1,9 +1,15 @@
> Rockchip rk timer
>
> Required properties:
> -- compatible: shall be one of:
> - "rockchip,rk3288-timer" - for rk3066, rk3036, rk3188, rk322x, rk3288, rk3368
> - "rockchip,rk3399-timer" - for rk3399
> +- compatible: should be:
should be one of:
> + "rockchip,rk3036-timer", "rockchip,rk3288-timer": for Rockchip RK3036
> + "rockchip,rk3066-timer", "rockchip,rk3288-timer": for Rockchip RK3066
> + "rockchip,rk3188-timer", "rockchip,rk3288-timer": for Rockchip RK3188
> + "rockchip,rk3228-timer", "rockchip,rk3288-timer": for Rockchip RK3228
> + "rockchip,rk3229-timer", "rockchip,rk3288-timer": for Rockchip RK3229
> + "rockchip,rk3288-timer": for Rockchip RK3288
> + "rockchip,rk3368-timer", "rockchip,rk3288-timer": for Rockchip RK3368
> + "rockchip,rk3399-timer": for Rockchip RK3399
I find the "for Rockchip RKxxxx" a bit redundant, but it's fine with or
without. Otherwise,
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists