[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1492709557-26256-1-git-send-email-boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 13:32:37 -0400
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
To: jgross@...e.com
Cc: xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH] xen/pvh: Do not fill kernel's e820 map in init_pvh_bootparams()
e820 map is updated with information from the zeropage (i.e.
pvh_bootparams) by default_machine_specific_memory_setup().
With the way things are done now, we end up with a duplicated
e820 map.
Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
---
This patch is against for-linus-4.12 branch. Since this is not
a critical issue I don't want to submit it to 4.11 at rc8 time
(plus it will require rebasing for-linus-4.12).
arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pvh.c | 6 ------
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pvh.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pvh.c
index 331d769..7ce319a9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pvh.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pvh.c
@@ -33,7 +33,6 @@ static void xen_pvh_arch_setup(void)
static void __init init_pvh_bootparams(void)
{
struct xen_memory_map memmap;
- unsigned int i;
int rc;
memset(&pvh_bootparams, 0, sizeof(pvh_bootparams));
@@ -60,12 +59,7 @@ static void __init init_pvh_bootparams(void)
sanitize_e820_map(pvh_bootparams.e820_map,
ARRAY_SIZE(pvh_bootparams.e820_map),
&memmap.nr_entries);
-
pvh_bootparams.e820_entries = memmap.nr_entries;
- for (i = 0; i < pvh_bootparams.e820_entries; i++)
- e820_add_region(pvh_bootparams.e820_map[i].addr,
- pvh_bootparams.e820_map[i].size,
- pvh_bootparams.e820_map[i].type);
pvh_bootparams.hdr.cmd_line_ptr =
pvh_start_info.cmdline_paddr;
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists