[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1704202137440.2373@nanos>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 21:40:12 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
James Hartsock <hartsjc@...hat.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Tim Wright <tim@...bash.co.uk>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tick: Make sure tick timer is active when bypassing
reprogramming
On Thu, 20 Apr 2017, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 07:56:22PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > /* Skip reprogram of event if its not changed */
> > > - if (ts->tick_stopped && (expires == ts->next_tick))
> > > + if (ts->tick_stopped && (expires == ts->next_tick)) {
> > > + WARN_ON_ONCE(dev->next_event > ts->next_tick);
> >
> > What about handling it proper ? dev->next_event might be KTIME_MAX,
> > i.e. no more event for the next 500+ years.
>
> I thought I handled this case, what I'm I missing?
if (ts->tick_stopped && (expires == ts->next_tick)) {
WARN_ON_ONCE(dev->next_event > ts->next_tick);
goto out;
}
IOW, the WARN_ON yells in dmesg, but despite seing the wreckage it just
leaves it and goes out doing nothing.
Why can't you just do
if (ts->tick_stopped && (expires == ts->next_tick)) {
if (dev->next_event > ts->next_tick)) {
WARN_ONCE();
do_something_sensible();
}
goto out;
}
Hmm?
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists