[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170420194646.qcpu7w3acjyfmeu5@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 20:46:46 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>
Cc: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dwc: disallow building designware_pcm as a module
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 05:48:15PM +0100, Jose Abreu wrote:
> What do you think Mark? If you want to keep the PCM as a module
> then we will need to abstract this more, by reducing the
> dependencies.
I think forcing this to be built in to the kernel (which is what the
commit message says the change is going to do) is an obviously bad
idea. Anything we add to the base kernel image needs to have a good
reason to be there and it is hard to think what that reason might be for
any audio driver, we need to be able to put this code into a module.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists