linux-kernel - [PATCH 3/4] sched/topology: move comment about asymmetric node setups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 20 Apr 2017 16:51:42 -0300
From:   Lauro Ramos Venancio <lvenanci@...hat.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     lwang@...hat.com, riel@...hat.com, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Lauro Ramos Venancio <lvenanci@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] sched/topology: move comment about asymmetric node setups

Signed-off-by: Lauro Ramos Venancio <lvenanci@...hat.com>
---
 kernel/sched/topology.c | 19 ++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
index 55bbaf7..e77c93a 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
@@ -495,14 +495,6 @@ enum s_alloc {
 /*
  * Build an iteration mask that can exclude certain CPUs from the upwards
  * domain traversal.
- *
- * Asymmetric node setups can result in situations where the domain tree is of
- * unequal depth, make sure to skip domains that already cover the entire
- * range.
- *
- * In that case build_sched_domains() will have terminated the iteration early
- * and our sibling sd spans will be empty. Domains should always include the
- * CPU they're built on, so check that.
  */
 static void build_group_mask(struct sched_domain *sd, struct sched_group *sg)
 {
@@ -612,7 +604,16 @@ static void init_overlap_sched_group(struct sched_domain *sd,
 
 		sibling = *per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sd, i);
 
-		/* See the comment near build_group_mask(). */
+		/*
+		 * Asymmetric node setups can result in situations where the
+		 * domain tree is of unequal depth, make sure to skip domains
+		 * that already cover the entire range.
+		 *
+		 * In that case build_sched_domains() will have terminated the
+		 * iteration early and our sibling sd spans will be empty.
+		 * Domains should always include the CPU they're built on, so
+		 * check that.
+		 */
 		if (!cpumask_test_cpu(i, sched_domain_span(sibling)))
 			continue;
 
-- 
1.8.3.1